Why We Need Your Help

The fight for justice is a long and arduous one, especially when facing a flawed legal system. Legal representation, expert witnesses, and investigation costs are incredibly high, and DeAngelo’s family has been struggling to cover these expenses on their own. This is where your support can make a world of difference.

How Your Donation Will Help

• Legal Representation: We are determined to secure the best legal team to reexamine DeAngelo’s case and present compelling evidence for his innocence.
• Investigation: Your contributions will enable us to conduct a thorough investigation to uncover any overlooked evidence or new leads that could exonerate DeAngelo.
• Expert Witnesses: We plan to bring in expert witnesses who can testify to DeAngelo’s innocence, providing a solid foundation for his appeal.
• Awareness Campaigns: Raising awareness about DeAngelo’s situation is crucial. Your support will help us spread the word through media campaigns, public events, and social media.

Every dollar counts in the battle to free DeAngelo Capone and reunite him with his family. Your generosity will not only give hope to DeAngelo but also serve as a reminder that no one should be denied their freedom unjustly. Together, we can make a significant impact and bring about the change that is desperately needed in our justice system.

Spread the Word

Even if you’re unable to contribute financially, you can still help by sharing this campaign on your social media platforms and within your community. Awareness is a powerful tool, and your efforts could be the catalyst for justice.

Thank You

We are immensely grateful for your support, and we believe that with your help, we can bring DeAngelo Capone home where he rightfully belongs. Let’s stand together against injustice and make a real difference in someone’s life. Your compassion can change the course of DeAngelo’s future. Thank you for being a part of this fight for justice.

DeAngelo’s Story

The Trial of DeAngelo Capone recounts a harrowing case that exposed the flaws and biases of the legal system. DeAngelo’s trial was marred by dubious evidence, unreliable witnesses, and manipulation of procedures. Despite an acquittal on a kidnapping charge, his murder trial relied on questionable identifications and a five-year-old child’s testimony.

Despite having no DNA or forensic evidence against DeAngelo and relying mostly on the testimony of co-defendants, who have now admitted to coercion, even after serving three decades, obtaining his sentencing transcripts, which verify the judge making DeAngelo parole eligible after serving 20 years, has proven an arduous battle.

DeAngelo’s story calls for systemic reform, fairness, and accountability in the pursuit of justice. His transformation into a mentor, religious elder, author, human rights, transformative justice, and prison reform advocate underscores the potential for positive change despite injustice.

Read the details here: The Trial of DeAngelo Capone

Parole Procedures

In a cruel twist of fate, even after enduring the tumultuous trial, DeAngelo Capone’s journey toward justice continued to be fraught with obstacles. After serving three decades behind bars, his judge deemed him eligible for parole after serving approximately 20 years. However, the path to redemption remains marred by the bureaucratic challenges that plague the criminal justice system.

In a stark example of the systemic roadblocks that can impede fairness and transparency, DeAngelo faced the Herculean task of obtaining his sentencing transcript from the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts.

This seemingly straightforward request revealed the systemic deficiencies that can thwart the pursuit of justice. The struggle to secure a vital piece of documentation encapsulated the broader issues that had marred DeAngelo’s trial from the start. The trial’s complex web of unreliable testimonies, manipulated evidence, and coerced witnesses was not an isolated incident, but rather a reflection of systemic flaws that can tip the scales of justice.

DeAngelo’s ordeal serves as a poignant illustration of the need for comprehensive reform within the criminal justice system. His case demonstrates the urgency of addressing issues such as witness coercion, biased identification procedures, and the mishandling of evidence.

In conclusion, the trial of DeAngelo Capone stands as a poignant tale of a justice system fraught with complexities, biases, and flaws. His story serves as an urgent call for reform, a demand that the legal system be held to the highest standards of transparency, fairness, and integrity.

As DeAngelo’s pursuit of his sentencing transcript illustrates, the challenges of the system do not end with the verdict, but continue in the arduous quest for justice that follows. It is a story that urges society to reflect on the transformative power of reform, so that tales of injustice may one day be replaced with stories of redemption and equity. DeAngelo himself has become a proponent of equal justice and prison reform with the Scandinavian Normality Model.

Case Concerns

In the annals of criminal justice, the trial of DeAngelo Capone stands as a stark reminder of the complexities and fallibilities of the legal system. The events that unfolded on February 24, 1994, painted a harrowing picture of a man ensnared in a web of dubious evidence, unreliable testimonies, and questionable tactics.

Questionable Trial Foundation

The trial’s inception was marked by a surprising turn of events. A man who, after seeing his car on the news, presented himself to authorities two days later, claiming that he had been kidnapped and coerced into driving DeAngelo and his co-defendants to the scene of the crime. This startling revelation formed the foundation of the prosecution’s case against DeAngelo.

However, the jury’s skepticism was palpable, leading to DeAngelo being found not guilty on the kidnapping charge. This man, although admittedly the driver, was never charged. The claim’s incredibility seems to cast doubt on the prosecution’s narrative from the very outset.

Identification Concerns

Crucial to the trial were the testimonies of two brothers who asserted that they had identified DeAngelo as the individual running from the crime scene. However, their credibility was tarnished by their proximity to a known gang hangout, where DeAngelo was known to frequent.

These brothers were no strangers to the world of drugs and had direct dealings with the very gang that DeAngelo was linked to. Their assertions, fraught with the potential for bias, were further clouded by the fact that they resided merely two houses away from this gang hub.

The likelihood that they could have easily identified DeAngelo, even under the cover of night, was a point left unaddressed. Additionally, the prosecution’s decision to have a co-defendant with a striking resemblance to DeAngelo shave his head bald before appearing in the lineup added a layer of manipulation to the identification process, muddying the waters of impartiality.

Child Witness Testimony

A disturbing aspect of the trial was the testimony of a five-year-old child who, although claiming to have witnessed DeAngelo as the shooter of one victim, made an additional lineup identification and testimony claiming another co-defendant as the shooter of another victim.

The child’s age raised legitimate concerns about the accuracy and reliability of his account. To compound these concerns, the child was permitted to sit on his father’s lap while testifying, an arrangement that could have potentially influenced his responses. Shockingly, DeAngelo’s defense attorney failed to cross-examine this crucial witness, leaving a glaring gap in the pursuit of truth and justice.

Evidence Concerns

The trial’s handling of evidence was equally confounding. The prosecution presented to the jury a .380 caliber handgun and strategically emphasized its use, even though the actual murder weapon was never recovered. This approach seemed aimed at swaying the jury’s perception and creating an association between DeAngelo and the crime.

Yet, the absence of concrete evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, or gunpowder residue raised serious doubts about the veracity of the accusations.

Missing Evidence in Robbery Charge

Perhaps most perplexing was the jury’s decision to find DeAngelo guilty of robbery despite the prosecution failing to present any of the items allegedly stolen. No jewelry, money, or drugs were ever recovered or shown to the jury.

The charge rested heavily on the testimony of a co-defendant who claimed that DeAngelo had shown him the items supposedly taken during the incident. Yet, this assertion was never corroborated by physical evidence or supported by any credible witness. This glaring absence further eroded the integrity of the prosecution’s case, raising serious concerns about how a conviction could stand without tangible proof of the alleged crime.

Co-Defendant Testimony

Most damningly, a trio of co-defendants who initially testified against DeAngelo are now recanting their statements and testimony, revealing that they had been coerced and threatened into falsely incriminating him. This revelation underscored the troubling tactics employed by the prosecution, highlighting the vulnerability of individuals caught in the criminal justice system.

Furthermore, a co-defendant who had taken a plea deal admitted that he had no incriminating information to share about DeAngelo’s involvement in the crime. This co-defendant was not brought to trial by the prosecutors or defense attorneys, a baffling omission that cast a shadow over the fairness of the trial.

Verified Case Timeline

• February 24, 1994: The crime occurred in Cleveland, Ohio.
• August 1994: Trial held before Judge Michael J. Corrigan.
• August 22, 1994: Jury returned guilty verdicts on aggravated murder, burglary, and robbery; not guilty on kidnapping.
• July 20, 1995: Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction in part and reversed in part, with duplicate counts merged and the solitary confinement clause reversed.
• July 1, 2015: Cuyahoga County Court issued an order correcting the sentence to reflect the appellate ruling.
• Present: Capone remains incarcerated in Ohio and continues literary and rehabilitative work.

Case Files Archive

All files can be downloaded and printed in PDF versions from our Google Drive.

Publications and Creative Work

DeAngelo Capone is the author of multiple works published through Aurora International Publishing that combine education, spirituality, and rehabilitation. His writings explore personal transformation, justice, and the sacred balance between humanity and spirit.

Support the Advocacy Effort

Those who wish to support the educational and advocacy work surrounding this case may contribute through the official Donately campaign hosted by Aurora International Publishing. All contributions fund document recovery, legal research materials, and awareness initiatives managed by AIP. No funds are disbursed directly to incarcerated individuals.

Contact and Press Inquiries

Aurora International Publishing
Email: info@auroraipub.com
Website: www.auroraipub.com

Disclaimer: Aurora International Publishing is an independent publisher and curator of educational materials. All documents presented here are part of the public record or reproduced with permission for educational use.